Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.rights.licenseReconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional. (CC BY-NC-ND)-
dc.contributor.authorOchoviet, Cristinaes
dc.contributor.authorParodi, Sebastiánes
dc.date.accessioned2026-09-15T13:58:14Z-
dc.date.available2026-09-15T13:58:14Z-
dc.date.issued2025-07-31-
dc.identifier.issn3081-0833-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12381/5679-
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents results from a case study conducted during the initial phase of an ongoing project investigating the difficulties prospective mathematics teachers (PMTs) face in understanding school-level linear algebra concepts, with the aim of designing their training. The research question addressed in this phase was: What difficulties related to the concept of solution of a system of linear equations can be identified when writing an imaginary lesson (IL) for lower secondary education? The theoretical framework is based on the perspective of Sierpinska (2000), who identifies three modes of thinking in linear algebra: synthetic-geometric (SG), analytic-arithmetic (AA), and analytic-structural (AS). In the SG mode, objects are presented to students through a geometric representation, such as a shape or a set of points. In the AA mode, mathematical objects are conceived through numerical relationships. In the AS mode, the focus is instead on the properties of the objects or their characterization through axioms. Each of these modes of thinking leads to different interpretations of the object, as each provides a distinct perspective on the algebraic entity in question. This case study involved four PMTs. In this paper, we report only the findings related to one of the participants. Data collection was carried out through the writing of an IL to teach systems of linear equations with two variables to 14- to 15-year-old students. The starting point was an imaginary student's response: “Because there is no numerical equality”. The PMT had to elaborate on what the student was responding to and how the lesson progressed. The results indicate that the IL was influenced by the PMT's understanding of the solution concept, which was exclusively framed within the SG mode of thinking and limited to the case of parallel lines as the only graphical configuration of a system with no solution. This is consistent with Oktaç (2018); however, the findings show how these conceptions come into play not only in the context in which the PMT learns linear algebra but also in the context of teaching—that is, when the PMT assumes the role of a teacher, an aspect that this project aims to address.es
dc.description.sponsorshipAgencia Nacional de Investigación e Innovaciónes
dc.language.isoenges
dc.rightsAcceso abierto*
dc.sourcePsychology of Mathematics Education (PME 48)es
dc.subjectLinear algebraes
dc.subjectProspective mathematics teacherses
dc.subjectSystems of linear equationses
dc.titleMODES OF THINKING WHILE IMAGINING TEACHINGes
dc.typeDocumento de conferenciaes
dc.subject.aniiCiencias Sociales
dc.subject.aniiCiencias de la Educación
dc.subject.aniiEducación General
dc.identifier.aniiFMV_3_2024_1_181336es
dc.type.versionPublicadoes
dc.anii.institucionresponsableSociedad de Educación Matemática Uruguayaes
dc.anii.subjectcompleto//Ciencias Sociales/Ciencias de la Educación/Educación Generales
Aparece en las colecciones: Publicaciones de ANII

Archivos en este ítem:
archivo  Descripción Tamaño Formato
PME48_Modes_of_thinking_while_imagining_teaching.pdfDescargar 256.74 kBAdobe PDF

Las obras en REDI están protegidas por licencias Creative Commons.
Por más información sobre los términos de esta publicación, visita: Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional. (CC BY-NC-ND)